Caterpillar 289D vs Volvo T85C: Which Is the Better Value?
The Caterpillar 289D averages $42,498 CAD at auction, compared to $0 for the Volvo T85C. That's a $42,498 difference. Based on 173 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Volvo T85C is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $42,498 less than the 289D.
Caterpillar 289D
CTL$42,498 CAD avg
$15,938
Low
$85,752
High
173
Sales
Avg 4,178 hours · 2014–2019 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 289D and T85C?
- Price: The T85C is $42,498 cheaper on average (100% savings).
Both Caterpillar and Volvo retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 289D or T85C? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 289D or T85C?
Choose the Caterpillar 289D if:
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Volvo T85C if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($42,498 savings)
- You prefer Volvo's dealer network and parts availability
How do 289D and T85C prices compare by year?
| Year | Caterpillar 289D | Volvo T85C |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $50,672 (14) | — |
| 2018 | $50,661 (16) | — |
| 2017 | $45,097 (34) | — |
| 2016 | $44,284 (36) | — |
| 2015 | $37,230 (45) | — |
| 2014 | $36,763 (28) | — |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 289D and T85C prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Caterpillar 289D | Volvo T85C |
|---|---|---|
| 0-999 hrs | $73,797 (12) | — |
| 1,000-1,999 hrs | $53,030 (4) | — |
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | $54,344 (17) | — |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | $47,094 (50) | — |
| 4,000+ hrs | $32,996 (86) | — |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
Where can I buy a 289D or T85C in Canada?
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 289D
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Volvo T85C
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.