Caterpillar 279C2 vs Gehl 250: Which Is the Better Value?
The Caterpillar 279C2 averages $38,738 CAD at auction, compared to $19,070 for the Gehl 250. That's a $19,668 difference. Based on 20 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Gehl 250 is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $19,668 less than the 279C2.
Caterpillar 279C2
CTL$38,738 CAD avg
$28,841
Low
$62,237
High
14
Sales
Avg 3,407 hours · 2012–2013 model years
Full price guide →Gehl 250
CTL$19,070 CAD avg
$4,857
Low
$32,627
High
6
Sales
Avg 1,880 hours · None–None model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 279C2 and 250?
- Price: The 250 is $19,668 cheaper on average (51% savings).
- Usage: Used 279C2s average 3,407 hours while 250s average 1,880 hours.
Both Caterpillar and Gehl retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 279C2 or 250? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 279C2 or 250?
Choose the Caterpillar 279C2 if:
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Gehl 250 if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($19,668 savings)
- You prefer Gehl's dealer network and parts availability
How do 279C2 and 250 prices compare by year?
| Year | Caterpillar 279C2 | Gehl 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | $45,659 (6) | — |
| 2012 | $33,547 (8) | — |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 279C2 and 250 prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Caterpillar 279C2 | Gehl 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000-1,999 hrs | — | $20,664 (2) |
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | $43,989 (6) | $31,493 (2) |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | $38,982 (4) | — |
| 4,000+ hrs | $30,618 (4) | — |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 279C2
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Gehl 250
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.