Case SR240 vs Caterpillar 256C: Which Is the Better Value?
The Case SR240 averages $25,323 CAD at auction, compared to $23,179 for the Caterpillar 256C. That's a $2,143 difference. Based on 32 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
Both machines are competitively priced with only a $2,143 difference. Your decision should come down to brand preference, dealer proximity, and specific feature needs rather than price alone.
Case SR240
SSL$25,323 CAD avg
$18,216
Low
$37,378
High
24
Sales
Avg 2,356 hours · 2015–2019 model years
Full price guide →Caterpillar 256C
CTL$23,179 CAD avg
$12,447
Low
$36,354
High
8
Sales
Avg 6,922 hours · 2007–2010 model years
Full price guide →How do SR240 and 256C specs compare?
| Spec | Case SR240 | Caterpillar 256C |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 84 hp | — |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 2,400 lbs | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,880 lbs | — |
| Lift Type | radial | — |
| Frame Size | mid | — |
| High Flow | 1 gpm | — |
What are the key differences between SR240 and 256C?
- Price: The 256C is $2,143 cheaper on average (8% savings).
- Track Type: SR240 is a wheeled skid steer (SSL) while 256C is a compact track loader (CTL). CTLs have better traction on soft ground; wheeled units are faster and cheaper to maintain.
- Usage: Used SR240s average 2,356 hours while 256Cs average 6,922 hours.
Both Case and Caterpillar retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a SR240 or 256C? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: SR240 or 256C?
Choose the Case SR240 if:
- You work on pavement, concrete, or hard surfaces
- You prefer Case's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Caterpillar 256C if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($2,143 savings)
- You work on soft ground, mud, or uneven terrain
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
How do SR240 and 256C prices compare by year?
| Year | Case SR240 | Caterpillar 256C |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $22,044 (2) | — |
| 2018 | $20,994 (6) | — |
| 2017 | $30,939 (2) | — |
| 2016 | $26,103 (8) | — |
| 2015 | $23,678 (4) | — |
| 2010 | — | $22,336 (4) |
| 2008 | — | $35,254 (2) |
| 2007 | — | $12,791 (2) |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do SR240 and 256C prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Case SR240 | Caterpillar 256C |
|---|---|---|
| 0-999 hrs | $36,146 (2) | — |
| 1,000-1,999 hrs | $26,758 (6) | — |
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | $25,400 (6) | $35,254 (2) |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | $21,527 (6) | — |
| 4,000+ hrs | $22,474 (2) | $17,180 (4) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Case SR240
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 256C
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.