Bobcat T200 vs Caterpillar 299C: Which Is the Better Value?
The Bobcat T200 averages $15,396 CAD at auction, compared to $36,055 for the Caterpillar 299C. That's a $20,658 difference. Based on 28 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Bobcat T200 is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $20,658 less than the 299C.
Bobcat T200
CTL$15,396 CAD avg
$6,795
Low
$22,011
High
14
Sales
Avg 3,973 hours · 2001–2003 model years
Full price guide →Caterpillar 299C
CTL$36,055 CAD avg
$82
Low
$52,070
High
14
Sales
Avg 3,896 hours · 2011–2012 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between T200 and 299C?
- Price: The T200 is $20,658 cheaper on average (57% savings).
Both Bobcat and Caterpillar retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a T200 or 299C? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: T200 or 299C?
Choose the Bobcat T200 if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($20,658 savings)
- You prefer Bobcat's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Caterpillar 299C if:
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
How do T200 and 299C prices compare by year?
| Year | Bobcat T200 | Caterpillar 299C |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | — | $37,086 (6) |
| 2011 | — | $47,013 (6) |
| 2003 | $19,380 (2) | — |
| 2002 | $15,150 (4) | — |
| 2001 | $14,524 (8) | — |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do T200 and 299C prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Bobcat T200 | Caterpillar 299C |
|---|---|---|
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | — | $48,224 (4) |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | $17,628 (8) | $42,691 (4) |
| 4,000+ hrs | $16,222 (2) | $35,234 (4) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Bobcat T200
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 299C
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.