Bobcat 709F vs New Holland L160: Which Is the Better Value?
The Bobcat 709F averages $3,476 CAD at auction, compared to $16,526 for the New Holland L160. That's a $13,050 difference. Based on 24 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Bobcat 709F is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $13,050 less than the L160.
New Holland L160
SSL$16,526 CAD avg
$12,447
Low
$23,861
High
8
Sales
Avg 2,661 hours · 2006–2007 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 709F and L160?
- Price: The 709F is $13,050 cheaper on average (79% savings).
Both Bobcat and New Holland retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 709F or L160? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 709F or L160?
Choose the Bobcat 709F if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($13,050 savings)
- You prefer Bobcat's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the New Holland L160 if:
- You prefer New Holland's dealer network and parts availability
How do 709F and L160 prices compare by year?
| Year | Bobcat 709F | New Holland L160 |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | — | $22,936 (2) |
| 2006 | — | $14,390 (6) |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 709F and L160 prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Bobcat 709F | New Holland L160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000-1,999 hrs | — | $18,939 (4) |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | — | $13,083 (2) |
| 4,000+ hrs | — | $15,144 (2) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Bobcat 709F
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on New Holland L160
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.