Bobcat 709F vs Caterpillar 262B: Which Is the Better Value?
The Bobcat 709F averages $3,476 CAD at auction, compared to $18,443 for the Caterpillar 262B. That's a $14,967 difference. Based on 36 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Bobcat 709F is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $14,967 less than the 262B.
Caterpillar 262B
SSL$18,443 CAD avg
$11,840
Low
$26,564
High
20
Sales
Avg 4,186 hours · 2004–2007 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 709F and 262B?
- Price: The 709F is $14,967 cheaper on average (81% savings).
Both Bobcat and Caterpillar retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 709F or 262B? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 709F or 262B?
Choose the Bobcat 709F if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($14,967 savings)
- You prefer Bobcat's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Caterpillar 262B if:
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
How do 709F and 262B prices compare by year?
| Year | Bobcat 709F | Caterpillar 262B |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | — | $19,357 (2) |
| 2006 | — | $16,135 (10) |
| 2005 | — | $21,753 (6) |
| 2004 | — | $19,143 (2) |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 709F and 262B prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Bobcat 709F | Caterpillar 262B |
|---|---|---|
| 0-999 hrs | — | $22,441 (2) |
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | — | $19,614 (2) |
| 3,000-3,999 hrs | — | $19,357 (2) |
| 4,000+ hrs | — | $16,410 (8) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Bobcat 709F
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 262B
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.