Bobcat 709F vs Caterpillar 242B: Which Is the Better Value?
The Bobcat 709F averages $3,476 CAD at auction, compared to $18,764 for the Caterpillar 242B. That's a $15,288 difference. Based on 38 verified Canadian auction results tracked by TrackCheck, here's the full breakdown.
The Verdict
The Bobcat 709F is the better value buy for most Canadian buyers, averaging $15,288 less than the 242B.
Caterpillar 242B
SSL$18,764 CAD avg
$7,286
Low
$29,380
High
22
Sales
Avg 3,523 hours · 2004–2013 model years
Full price guide →What are the key differences between 709F and 242B?
- Price: The 709F is $15,288 cheaper on average (81% savings).
Both Bobcat and Caterpillar retain value well. See our depreciation guide for brand rankings.
Looking for a 709F or 242B? Check current listings with Deal Scores.
Which is the better value: 709F or 242B?
Choose the Bobcat 709F if:
- You want lower upfront cost ($15,288 savings)
- You prefer Bobcat's dealer network and parts availability
Choose the Caterpillar 242B if:
- You prefer Caterpillar's dealer network and parts availability
How do 709F and 242B prices compare by year?
| Year | Bobcat 709F | Caterpillar 242B |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | $17,396 (2) |
| 2012 | — | $19,401 (2) |
| 2008 | — | $29,111 (2) |
| 2006 | — | $27,942 (2) |
| 2005 | — | $16,962 (10) |
| 2004 | — | $13,874 (4) |
Prices in CAD. Numbers in parentheses are sample size. Lower price highlighted.
How do 709F and 242B prices compare by hours?
| Hours | Bobcat 709F | Caterpillar 242B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000-1,999 hrs | — | $19,840 (4) |
| 2,000-2,999 hrs | — | $24,793 (4) |
| 4,000+ hrs | — | $21,238 (8) |
Hours matter more than age for resale value. See our hours vs age analysis.
More Comparisons
Related Guides
Get Pricing
Get a Price Quote on Bobcat 709F
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.
Get a Price Quote on Caterpillar 242B
We'll send you current pricing and available units. No spam.